Hi, welcome to Superpower Fanon Wiki! I'm a member of FANDOM's Community Support team. Thank you for your edit to Homo Magi Physiology!

It looks as though none of the admins for this community are active right now, but if you need help, check out help pages or stop by Community Central to explore our forums.

You can also follow the Staff blog to keep up-to-date with the latest news and events around Wikia. And don't forget to check out FANDOM University for quick how-to videos.

Please leave me a message if I can help with anything.

Enjoy your time at Superpower Fanon Wiki!

Sannse @fandom (help forum | blog) 04:57, July 5, 2019 (UTC)


I just want you to know that if you are going to copy the existing powers onto this wiki, you will have to use characters from fan fictional material instead of the ones from canon material. Is that alright? ChocolateElemental (talk) 16:21, July 7, 2019 (UTC)

Good to be here dude.--Morningstar123

Regarding your Past StatementsEdit

TBH, your negative stance with overly specific things and excessive detail is what I find nonsensicle, and that stance alone will just affect quality in a bad way. It's not like the said articles will bring a negative impact in terms of the quality of said wikis. The benefit of excessive/overly specific things is that they are more honest in terms of what they show you. However, as for disallowing excessive/overly specific details, this will just end up being a massive disadvantage whenever it comes to quality, and that sort of action will just decrease the honesty, which I wouldn't exactly stand for. The articles you've been talking about aren't even the exact duplicate of a specific article anyways, they are only similar and are known to be variations to the powers. The entire point of encyclopedias/wikipedias are for only adding in (not creating) things that aren't documented yet, and too archive whatever information regarding the thing is for people to learn and spread wisdom, they aren't creativity competitions to see who has the most originality and ideas, and moreover, I have been witnessing overly specific/excessive details plenty of times in my life and I still don't see how those two factors can have a negative impact on the quality of something in a negative way. ChocolateElemental (talk) 18:20, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

About your Transcendent Homo Superior Physiology EditsEdit

First of all, it begs the question, how would a Human be a Transcendent Homo Superior without empowerments or micromutations, with the exception of only having massive mental capabilities? Are there even examples of that? I doubt it.

Additionally, the also called list is fine the way it is, the names do define Transcendent Metahumans accurately. ChocolateElemental (talk) 11:58, October 30, 2019 (UTC)

The whole point of Metahumans is that they not only have superpowers, but they could also have abilities that are on par with normal to peak Humans, such as Enhanced to Supernatural Condition. Heck, Transcendent Metahumans can possibly have Absolute Condition. Especially mental whenever it comes to any mental powers. On the other hand however, is that Transcendent Homo Superior Physiology already covers the idea of a Transcendent Human anyways. Sorry, but that's how it all is pretty much. ChocolateElemental (talk) 12:06, October 30, 2019 (UTC)

Eh, I don't know dude, because the things you mention doesn't feel true. Even if you show me evidence of those scenarios otherwise, it still wouldn't be a good idea to add Transcendent Human Physiology. This is because Transcendent Homo Superior already covers that, unless you want to add in the name into the Also Called list in the same article, then that will be better. ChocolateElemental (talk) 13:38, October 30, 2019 (UTC)

Uh, the point of superpowers is that they are supernatural, hence the prefix. Godly powers like Absolute Strength count as a superpower as well. While gaining Peak Human Conditioning and skills are powers to begin with. So yes, god-level abilities being not superpowers isn't exactly true pretty much, since supernatural is the main factor of how superpowers are defined. ChocolateElemental (talk) 14:45, October 30, 2019 (UTC)

Deleting Some Select Things I've Documented and UploadedEdit

Since I've witnessed that you do have a separate account where you are an admin, can you please delete some select articles and images? That'll be much appreciated.



ChocolateElemental (talk) 00:17, October 31, 2019 (UTC)

The RulesEdit

  1. It should be noted that since this is a fanon variation to the Superpower Wiki, which in hand allows only characters that are deemed canon and official, only fan-made characters (that can also stem from spinoffs, machinimas, fan made sequels to expansions, what have you), like OCs, and Freaks (which are more in common with Garry's Mod made machinimas). Additionally, this wiki also allows individuals and races of folklore.
  2. If the powers documented don't have any users available in terms of fanon characters even though the official characters are disallowed here, then I'm afraid the powers shouldn't be documented here, at least not yet until there will be a fanon user with said power to debut. ChocolateElemental (talk) 17:54, November 4, 2019 (UTC)

Transcendent Nephalem Pysiology Edit

I think the page is as accurate as it can get right now. Though things ,ay chane in the future...--Morningstar123


AZS, you have to always consider more before taking action on things, and you are going out of control. I'm so SICK and tired, of repeating what I've said before, the SCP Foundation is made an official series, so PLEASE stop it. The rules aren't hidden, they're on the main page of the wiki. 😑 *facepalm* ChocolateElemental (talk) 17:11, November 29, 2019 (UTC)

Still, don't do it. You're simply making this wiki messy and taking things out of control. Sure, wikis can be fun to use and all, but trust me, there's always going to be some certain rules to balance things out, and you will have to follow, as well as remember them. I was expecting the FANON community to get back to me eventually into becoming an admin of this wiki, but they haven't yet. So please, try your best to follow the guidelines. ChocolateElemental (talk) 22:58, December 1, 2019 (UTC)

Goblinoid Physiology Edit

Arrange the users section properly please.-Morningstar1123

Goblinoid Physiology Edit

Sorry i should have been more specific. I meant specify which goblins are mytholoical, and when you say media there are thousands. Specify which one.-Morningstar1123

Goblinoid Physiology Edit

Welcome bro--Morningstar123

Ghouls Edit

The human undead ghouls are an idea from the European countries and they were considered undead demonic beings. 

This thing you keep doing were you say, it's just a reachable position, makes no sense. In that regard any short person who steals is a goblin any good person is an angel and every tree hugger is dryad. It's called metaphor dude. Metaphorically all these entities could be people but within each each story they are anything but.--Morningstar123

😧 it was an example. And the arabian nights is a literary group of religious texts. Send me proof that they aren't demons because in wikipedia they are categorised as demons. Also something called comparative mythology exists, so they DO possess comparable traits.

Marids are huge, but the race known as giants are completely different and nowhere near as powerful. --Morningstar123

Bro, i am trying really hard to be calm as i explain this to you but youre making it really difficult. 

Islam isnt comparable to other religions? Dont mean to be rude, but islam isn't mkre special than other religions. All Abrahamic religions are comparable whether you like it or not. And as they have origins from zoroastrianism they are comparable to it as well. Can you drop this already? Its one thing to love your religion and another to act the fool because of it.

Arabian nights was written during the islamic golden age so it was influenced by islam. That doesnt mean its a religious book. Its just a book that has records of the entities prevalent in islamic and arabian culture. I dont know what you've been reading but they were compared to the gallu, to shedims(who are jinns anyway) and their mortality has been compared to buddhist gods.

In islam ghouls are the jinn children of iblis, who is a demon king, and in Europe they are evil spirits of dead sinners. The only variant that isnt demonic is the cursed variant, a curse caused by cannibalism. Considering that almost all jinns are a type of demon, i dont even understand  why you're arguing. They are humans with superpowers? What are your sources because in all honesty that sounds like bullshit. 

There are no demonic undead in norse or greek myth. Dont even start. 

Yeah duh they arent jinn in those religions because jinn are islamic and arabian entities. 😑--Morningstar123

"I meant the Islam isn't comparable in meaning of words and terms"- Sorry but you dont get to decide that. The fact is, its already been compared and there really is nothing you can do about it.

"because everything godly and supernatural in other religion in Islam just humans and demons"-Not all jinn are demons, meaning there is a difference between demons and pure bred jinn. Also angels exist. Just because there are only 3 major races in islam does not mean it cant be compared. You are literally argueing against something that has already been done.

"but that thing different kinda than christianity because there is concept not exist in christianity like Jinn, also shayatin (demons) they are obviously different than satans.I agreed with about there are many mythical beings resemble to Jinn and comparable to them like unseelie and spiritual fairies, ikiryo, daeva, shedim but they are not actually jinn"-If by satans you mean fallen angels then sorry to say youre wrong. A demon is a demon regardless of setting and will always have similar traits. I said comparitive, not exactly the same. I understand that youre english is bad, but if you dont understand something just use the dictionary.

"that remind me with divs a kind of ogre like jinn from persian folklore they are also similar to ghouls because in Persian and Arabian folklore ghouls are mixed with giants, ogres and trolls due to their similarity (both of four beings are big cannibals)"-...Divs are demons and can take any form, so there is not and cannot be any link to trolls. I have personally never seen a comparison between daevas/divs and jinn and they are not similar. Ghouls are not 'mixed' with any other entity apart from jinn. What have you been reading bruh? You had better send me your sources quick cuz it sounds like someone has been feeding ou some crazy shit. Even wikipedia might be more accurate than your sources.

"honestly I like to discuss with you because you always told me your reasons see ya"-Thanks bro. Till next time.


Well, to be fair, I see your point, but as long as the info is linked to sources, and if the Wikipedia site could improve more and more for the better over time, then I'm sure it'll be more worth using, unlike the present day. I'm sure of it. You are more than welcome to give me a link to Google Book so I can see what it looks like and how it functions. ChocolateElemental (talk) 20:52, April 3, 2020 (UTC)

Oh right, what I use is Google Translate, that's what I was using to get the words. ChocolateElemental (talk) 20:00, April 6, 2020 (UTC)

Since Tetrology is added, will Trilogy/Tinity Deity Physiology be added to this wiki as well? ChocolateElemental (talk) 16:23, May 3, 2020 (UTC)

Hello, can you please clarify clearer on what the users would be? ChocolateElemental (talk) 22:43, May 7, 2020 (UTC)

  1. What about God?
  2. To be honest, I have to personally disagree with the users being nigh omnipotent because, a Trinity God is a Monotheistic Deity that has True Omniscience, Omnipresence, as well as Omnipotence, full stop. Plus, I heavily doubt there would be evidence to support your statement. Even if there was, then it's vitally important that you have to make sure to divide and categorize the N-OP and T-OP parts into two variations within the capabilities section, otherwise people would take the article at its word that a Trinity God can either be Nigh Omnipotent, or Truly Omnipotent even though it would've been tied around to the same classification. When you consider it even deeper, then you will eventually realize how nonsensical and untidy it would be. That's the point I have to make here, and hopefully you do agree with my stance on taking this. ChocolateElemental (talk) 23:42, May 7, 2020 (UTC)

What about splitting the clarifications into two variations in the capabilities section? ChocolateElemental (talk) 13:30, May 8, 2020 (UTC)

You know the Homo Superior Physiology? It contains two category sub-descriptions where it helps with the readers that there are two perspectives on how the power can be perceived. We can do the same with the Trilogy article. ChocolateElemental (talk) 20:15, May 8, 2020 (UTC)

I have filled in the sub-descriptions and did the first paragraphs, so all you have to do is add in the secondary ones. We can call this teamwork. ChocolateElemental (talk) 23:52, May 8, 2020 (UTC)

Cyber Mutant PhysiologyEdit

I'd say the Gunslinger Vagineer, the Teamless Vagineer, and the Mastermind Vagineer (limited to when he is the Necroborg Vagineer) are of this physiology. ChocolateElemental (talk) 20:24, May 10, 2020 (UTC)

Why do you think that? Of course all three of them can be Cyber Mutants. The Teamless Vagineer has a short-circuit gun replacing his right hand. ChocolateElemental (talk) 21:21, May 10, 2020 (UTC)

Trilogy Discussion ContinuedEdit

To be quite honest though, I still don't know about the decision of adding nigh-omnipotent individuals. I mean, I understand we had an agreement in regards to explaining two separate variations to it with the more powerful one being the true one. But I don't even know on where the information is coming from, because I've looked everywhere on what the individual users' capabilities are, but no. Even if the info exists, then its just unofficial speculation. ChocolateElemental (talk) 11:24, May 18, 2020 (UTC)

Most of the users except Para Brahman and God himself. Also what has been gotten wrong, is that actually, God is the Holy Trinity. And in all honesty, a Trinity God is exactly of the True Omnipotence, Omniscience, and also the Omnipresence category, and always will be. It would be best if the power article is kept the way it was, even though I know for certain its controversial. ChocolateElemental (talk) 15:29, May 18, 2020 (UTC)

Like I've told you, please don't add any articles without the addition of unofficial/fan-based characters that fit the power to a straight T. Know this rule off by heart. ChocolateElemental (talk) 17:18, May 19, 2020 (UTC)

Trilogy Article ReversedEdit

I've completely changed my mind, we have to literally keep the page the way it is, because that's what a Trinity God literally is. Having less powerful abilities doesn't make them so (e.g nigh omnipotence). The users I've removed and researched on, are something less than a Trinity God. In case you get riled up with my actions, I have to encourage you to document a lesser version of this. At the same time, I suggest you should rename Trilogy to "Monotheistic Trilogy instead." I looked in the books on Google Books, but you are just adding false info. And quite frankly, I doubt documenting the lesser version of Monotheistic Trilogy would work either, because the users you've added, won't even qualify. The three aren't as one being, and nothing says they are nigh/truly omniscient, omnipotent, or omnipresent. ChocolateElemental (talk) 18:00, May 19, 2020 (UTC)

I don't know what kind of source you are getting the scraps of information from, but I think you are just fabricating them. ChocolateElemental (talk) 18:02, May 19, 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks dude for understanding. 😉 ChocolateElemental (talk) 14:32, May 20, 2020 (UTC)

Gestalt Monotheistic Deity Physiology is An Awful OneEdit

A Trinity Deity is actually the True Monotheistic Deity, and as for the other one, it needs to be deleted on the spot because of how bad it is. Too bad I am not an administrator yet to fix things. -__-  ChocolateElemental (talk) 18:09, June 23, 2020 (UTC)

  • Sigh* I don't even know, I guess having it deleted on the spot back in the Superpower Wiki is a terrible idea, as I could've at least reinterpreted it, but much more correctly into what a Trinity Deity is. I'm frustrated now. ChocolateElemental (talk) 22:12, June 23, 2020 (UTC)

Very well then. I want you to please help me retcon/massively rewrite this article and rename it to Trinity God Physiology. Can we at least do that? ChocolateElemental (talk) 12:34, June 24, 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks. 😉 ChocolateElemental (talk) 15:50, June 24, 2020 (UTC)

Again, like I have explained many times before, using overly specific details is a good thing due to how useful it is to giving the information/details more honesty, clarification,  and proof to that the subject/object is. Does that make sense? There's nothing wrong with using overly specificness, but this is just because certain people are just wrongfully biased against that sort of thing, and it does bother me pretty much. ChocolateElemental (talk) 16:44, June 25, 2020 (UTC)

I can go as far as to say, that you maybe sort of right, but you are wrong at the same time. There are Human magicians outside of DC Comics, so I don't think you are paying attention a lot to the Mystic Human Physiology article back in the Superpower Wiki. Besides, we improvised the latin words and you didn't exactly find any issues with it at that time.

As for Superior Mystic Human, they may not be technically hybrids, you are not wrong on that, but I will tell you that they are only just that theoretically, as they have not only powers that only magicians will have, and that the empowered subjects are capable of possibly obtaining in terms of abilities.

P:S: I have serious doubts that Eternals are Aliens because, they are technically Transcendent Superior Humans as they are derived from the Celestials experimenting on bipedal apes prior to evolving into mainstream humans rather than simians. They are also called Homo Immortalis. The keyword is Homo, which means Human. ChocolateElemental (talk) 11:57, June 26, 2020 (UTC)

Yeah. ChocolateElemental (talk) 12:43, June 26, 2020 (UTC)

Ultimate Hybrid Physiology Edit

I asked the Admins to have permission if they give me the permission I would do it. If not then I'm afraid I'm sorry I respect the rules and guidelines Bro.  PS Sorry for the late Answer I was kinda busy with my work.  Your Helper0605 

So, are you going to be working on the rest of the Trinity God Physiology article? Because I did do some of it for you. ChocolateElemental (talk) 19:56, June 28, 2020 (UTC)

Bionic Physiology: Fair enough, just do whatever you can to fix it as long as it's reasonable. ChocolateElemental (talk) 18:46, July 1, 2020 (UTC)

Trinity God Physiology: That's good to hear. ChocolateElemental (talk) 18:46, July 1, 2020 (UTC)

Just so you know, I have cleansed the Trinity God Physiology article to a limited degree, so you can fix it to the point on how it should represent the name. ChocolateElemental (talk) 22:52, July 6, 2020 (UTC)

Wait... I thought you are going to be doing the rest of it after I have done some of it for you. I may have helped you, sure, but I don't want to do all the heavy lifting. ChocolateElemental (talk) 23:11, July 6, 2020 (UTC)

Based on your Opinion?Edit

What the heck are you doing? You have reversed the edit just because you think its much better? Dude, the whole point of how both the wikis and encyclopedias function, is based on factual information in terms of fiction or non-fiction domains, not opinions. Doing so within wikis/encyclopedias will make most of the individuals within those areas as users, moderators, admins, and as well as founders, will just make them wrongfully biased, and it will literally make you misrepresent on how they have to behave within the system. You have to do your job within those sites with an unbiased & neutral stance, and being professional in your way of thinking. Making/reversing edits just because you agree or disagree with them is a bad business/career move, and it will likely piss off the userbase itself additionally. The rule of being unbiased, professional, and also neutral, applies to all of us, and that's a fact. Understood? ChocolateElemental (talk) 07:49, August 17, 2020 (UTC)

It's not the point, how does this all have anything to do with what I said to you? ChocolateElemental (talk) 08:09, August 17, 2020 (UTC)

You mean to tell me that you don't know the definition of the certain words I've said? If so, which ones? Your very reason that you said, further proves to me that you are reversing/adding edits just because you yourself, subjectively, believe them to be correct, rather than making any effort to do some precise and professional research. Do you not see the problem? ChocolateElemental (talk) 08:20, August 17, 2020 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.